
|
Toronto-Exotic-Massage.com. The Directory of Canada's Massage Parlours
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
|
Mayor Rob Ford recently pranced around during the Nutcracker but over at City Hall
some major shit is going down. It appears hundreds of holistic spas were given
"operating a bodyrub" ticket. The reason is unclear.
It is likely done to generate income for the "bankrupt" city.
Another weird twist is that some staffer have met the bodyrub parlour owners to see if they mind
increasing the cap above 25.
|
|
|
|
Montreal is well known as a Sexy City
There is a place in Montreal where they used to have a receptionist who would bring you to your room, turn on the shower and then come back a minute later. She would then actually open the shower door and ask if everything is ok and she'd reach in and start rubbing you a bit, then she'd strat "warming things up" for you. She always left you good and hard then she'd disappear and you'd be plenty ready when your MPA came in the room. It was their way of making sure the client took a shower, but it was also seen as a nice warm up by the clients. Source:TERB.ca
|
|
 | |
|
 | |
|
 | |
|

 | |  |
It has been ten years since the release of the Rub and Tug movie.
What has changed? What have we learned?
In 2002, there were about 400 massage parlours evenly spread throughout the city.
There were a hundred Asian spas and almost as many parlours with Russian and Romanian women.
Steeles Royal was a small spa owned by a Czech woman. A few days a week, Joy drove in from small town Ontario to work.
Hands From Heaven was in Woodbridge and featured Cameron, Jennifer and porn star Voilet Marcel.
Allure was exactly the same. Platinum and Alphacare haven't changed much either.
Other prominent spas from ten years ago are still open: Utopia, Silhouette, Studio 34, Golden Touch, Starlight, Oasis, Elite Retreat.
Many have closed: Sun and Moon, Barbaras, Invisible Touch, T&T.
In 2012, there are about 400 massage parlours in the GTA the same amount as decade ago. They are much more luxurious now.
Brampton was a hotbed for massage parlours in the 1990s and has become further entrenched since the 2002 court ruling.
The Asian scene has changed dramatically.
Chinese spas are more prevalent but are more concentrated in Scarborough where there are dozens of holistic spas.
All the massage parlours on East Beaver Creek have closed.
To conclude this essay: not very much has changed in ten years.
|
|
 | |  |
Ontario's Appeals court rules in favour of Prostitutes on March 26th, 2012.
This may pave the way for 1) massage parlours offering full-service 2) large brothels like they have in Europe 3)complete reworking of bodyrub and holistic licensing
A ban on brothels puts prostitutes at risk and is therefore unconstitutional, Ontario's top court ruled Monday.
However, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the ban on soliciting as a reasonable way to protect communities.
It also "read in" wording to the criminalization of living on the avails of prostitution to make it clear that exploitation of prostitutes should be illegal.
"Prostitution is a controversial topic, one that provokes heated and heartfelt debate about morality, equality, personal autonomy and safety," the court wrote in a split decision stretching to 132 pages.
"It is not the court's role to engage in that debate. Our role is to decide whether or not the challenged laws accord with the constitution."
The ruling came in an appeal by the government of a lower court ruling that found the three provisions unconstitutional in that they contributed to the dangers faced by prostitutes.
The five-panel judge only agreed fully with the lower court in finding that the law against brothels was too broad because "it captures conduct that is unlikely to lead to the problems Parliament seeks to curtail."
The court also found the impact is "grossly disproportionate" to the law's intent because "the safest way to sell sex is for a prostitute to work indoors in a location under her control."
At the same time, it suspended its declaration for 12 months to give Parliament an opportunity to draft a new law if it so chooses.
At the same time, the court said the effective ban on street prostitution makes sense because harm to the community is real.
"While street prostitution poses real and grave dangers to the prostitutes themselves, it also has a profound impact on the members of the surrounding community," the justices wrote.
As such, the court found, the ban on communicating publicly for the purposes of prostitution is reasonable.
In addition, by allowing prostitutes to move indoors given the decriminalization of brothels, any harm caused by the ban on solicitation would be mitigated, the court said.
In a dissenting opinion on that score, two justices said they agreed with the trial judge's finding that the danger posed to street prostitutes by the ban on communicating should override the goal of combating social nuisance.
"The world in which street prostitutes actually operate is a world of dark streets and barren, isolated, silent places," the dissenters wrote.
"It is a dangerous world, with always the risk of violence and even death."
When it comes to living on the avails of prostitution, the court said the law could be reworded to specifically exclude the exploitation of prostitutes.
"This offence aims to protect vulnerable persons from being coerced, pressured or emotionally manipulated into prostitution," the court said.
The objective is to prevent "pimps from exploiting prostitutes and from profiting from the prostitution of others" but it also captures others such as a prostitute's bodyguards, accountant or receptionist.
"It captures conduct that is no way exploitative," the justices wrote.
However, the justices "read" words of limitation into the law so that it bars living on the avails "in circumstances of exploitation."
"This aligns the language of the provision with the vital legislative goal that animates it and cures the constitutional defect," they said.
"It introduces the requirement that the accused has unfairly taken advantage of the prostitute in his dealings with her."
They stayed that part of the ruling for 30 days.
|
|
|
| |
|